If you look Slav's phone and fax numbers are publicly avaiable along with a mail address or two. So should be contactable.
The business model here was free main component then sell add-ons which needed market penetration.
Lets be honest what we are getting for free is as good as many content generation systems costing very bloated prices.
LOL Time for a rant...
I've found a strange attitude in some corporate thinking that says 'free/FOSS' = Not good, expensive/branded = must be good.
As an example I was using the evaluation version of winzip to encrypt data, one comment from above was it's free so it can't be any good; so they bought a product that encrypted using 7zip, but that was good because it cost money per seat.
A lot of the large commercial bodies which is where this kind of money is in generating training material are often tied to archaic LCMS systems that barely support AICC let alone SCORM and tend to have tool sets that bodge the content to meet the quirks of the platform.
We have this where I work, it proudly procliams 2004 support .. as long as you import content as AICC, it also fails miserably with ADLs 1.n and '04 test suites. It also costs about x4 a seat per user over Illias or Moodle plus the buy in & support costs!!
Oh but I can get Courselab material to work on it with minimal work to the API.
If you look Slav's phone and fax numbers are publicly avaiable along with a mail address or two. So should be contactable.
The business model here was free main component then sell add-ons which needed market penetration.
Lets be honest what we are getting for free is as good as many content generation systems costing very bloated prices.
LOL Time for a rant...
I've found a strange attitude in some corporate thinking that says 'free/FOSS' = Not good, expensive/branded = must be good.
As an example I was using the evaluation version of winzip to encrypt data, one comment from above was it's free so it can't be any good; so they bought a product that encrypted using 7zip, but that was good because it cost money per seat.
A lot of the large commercial bodies which is where this kind of money is in generating training material are often tied to archaic LCMS systems that barely support AICC let alone SCORM and tend to have tool sets that bodge the content to meet the quirks of the platform.
We have this where I work, it proudly procliams 2004 support .. as long as you import content as AICC, it also fails miserably with ADLs 1.n and '04 test suites. It also costs about x4 a seat per user over Illias or Moodle plus the buy in & support costs!!
Oh but I can get Courselab material to work on it with minimal work to the API.